John C. Kmetz, 56, of Racine, Wisconsin has been charged with 29 counts of possession of child pornography after he allegedly offered investigators a most unique “daffynition” of child pornography.

It is alleged that during the course of a child pornography investigation, investigators asked Kmetz his definition of child pornography and Kmetz said that in his opinion they would be teenage girls under the age of 12 or 14 years of age.

Reportedly, Kmetz also said that as long as the girls had breasts they were not underage.

This in conjunction with Kmetz also allegedly telling officers that he had anywhere between 50 and 100 images of naked teenage girls that were 15 to 16 years of age on his computer.

To drive his point home, Kmetz in a written statement allegedly said “On my personal hard drive I would not consider 50 pictures of girls to be under age. I consider under age to be 12 years of age or 14 years of age.”

Cops say that on Kmetz’s hard drive they found numerous pictures of naked girls ranging in age from approximately 8 to 15-years-old, that the girls were posed in sexually explicit positions and that some images showed minor males and females engaged in intercourse.

Be sure and let us know how the “If they got boobs it ain’t kiddy porn” defense works out for ya’ John…

In the mean time, has anyone ever known of a teenage girl under 12-years-old?

Man charged with 29 counts of possession of child pornography